I wrote way back when that I didn't need genetic testing for the cancer gene, I already knew I had it. I've started to question that initial wisdom and presumption. I started to rethink this decision after finding even more research associating one cancer with a much higher risk of another. Of course, melanoma is oh so kind to appear in that research far more often than I'd like.
The last few weeks, I've wondered if I should get tested. The sensible side says yes and the other sensible side says, "What would you do with that information? Would it make a difference?" There's where this debate comes down to it for me. I know I am at a much higher risk for cancer. Duh! But I knew that before getting my initial diagnosis. I just wonder if knowing I'm at a higher risk of X kind of cancer would reduce my paranoia about the others and allow me to "relax" a little and be vigilant where most needed. Or would it just ramp up my paranoia because a risk isn't a guarantee or insurance. It also is no reassurance that I still won't stress myself out.
There's the basics of the argument I'm having in my head. Yes, I admit to that little voice that takes over most days still. I guess it all boils down to will the testing help me? And I don't have an answer yet. Please feel free to share your thoughts, it might help me figure out mine.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI have a quick question about your blog, would you mind emailing me when you get a chance?
Thanks,
Cameron
cameronvsj(at)gmail.com